Technology Readiness Levels for AI & ML
Alexander Lavin, Gregory Renard

TL;DR
This paper introduces TRL4ML, a framework adapting systems engineering principles to AI/ML development, aiming to improve robustness, reliability, and collaboration across organizations.
Contribution
It proposes a structured TRL-based process specifically tailored for AI/ML systems, bridging gaps between traditional engineering and ML development practices.
Findings
Defines a clear ML-specific TRL framework.
Highlights differences between ML and traditional software engineering.
Provides a common language for organizational collaboration.
Abstract
The development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. The lack of diligence can lead to technical debt, scope creep and misaligned objectives, model misuse and failures, and expensive consequences. Engineering systems, on the other hand, follow well-defined processes and testing standards to streamline development for high-quality, reliable results. The extreme is spacecraft systems, where mission critical measures and robustness are ingrained in the development process. Drawing on experience in both spacecraft engineering and AI/ML (from research through product), we propose a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment. Our Technology Readiness Levels for ML (TRL4ML) framework defines a principled process to ensure robust systems while being…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Assessment and Management
