Greedy Adversarial Equilibrium: An Efficient Alternative to Nonconvex-Nonconcave Min-Max Optimization
Oren Mangoubi, Nisheeth K. Vishnoi

TL;DR
This paper introduces the $ ext{ extsterling}$-greedy adversarial equilibrium, a computationally feasible alternative to min-max optimization for nonconvex-nonconcave functions, with guarantees of existence and convergence.
Contribution
It proposes the $ ext{ extsterling}$-greedy adversarial equilibrium model and an algorithm that finds such points efficiently for smooth functions with Lipschitz Hessian.
Findings
Existence of $ ext{ extsterling}$-greedy adversarial equilibrium for bounded smooth functions.
An algorithm converges to the equilibrium in polynomial evaluations.
The method is applicable in high-dimensional settings.
Abstract
Min-max optimization of an objective function is an important model for robustness in an adversarial setting, with applications to many areas including optimization, economics, and deep learning. In many applications may be nonconvex-nonconcave, and finding a global min-max point may be computationally intractable. There is a long line of work that seeks computationally tractable algorithms for alternatives to the min-max optimization model. However, many of the alternative models have solution points which are only guaranteed to exist under strong assumptions on , such as convexity, monotonicity, or special properties of the starting point. We propose an optimization model, the -greedy adversarial equilibrium, and show that it can serve as a computationally tractable alternative to the min-max optimization…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
