Constraint on the Yukawa suppression of the Newtonian potential from the planetary ephemeris INPOP19a
L. Bernus (1,2), O. Minazzoli (3,4), A. Fienga (2,1), M. Gastineau, (1), J. Laskar (1), P. Deram (2), A. Di Ruscio (2,5) ((1) IMCCE, Observatoire, de Paris, PSL University, CNRS, Sorbonne Universit\'e, Paris, France, (2), G\'eoazur, Observatoire de la C\^ote d'Azur

TL;DR
This study uses the latest planetary ephemeris data to set a new, stronger constraint on the Yukawa suppression of the Newtonian potential, which relates to the graviton's mass, surpassing previous gravitational wave bounds.
Contribution
Introduces a novel statistical method to derive constraints on Yukawa suppression from planetary ephemeris data, improving upon previous limits on graviton mass and Compton wavelength.
Findings
Degradation of residuals at certain wavelengths constrains graviton mass.
New limit: graviton mass > 3.62 x 10^{-23} eV/c^2.
Stronger than previous gravitational wave bounds.
Abstract
We use the latest solution of the ephemeris INPOP (19a) in order to improve our previous constraint on the existence of a Yukawa suppression to the Newtonian potential, generically associated to a graviton's mass. Unlike the ephemeris INPOP17a, several residuals are found to degrade significantly at roughly the same amplitudes of the Compton wavelength . As a consequence, we introduce a novel statistical criterion in order to derive the constraint with INPOP19a. After checking that it leads to a constraint consistent with our previous result when applied on INPOP17b, we apply the method to the new solution INPOP19a. We show that the residuals of Mars orbiters, Cassini, Messenger, and Juno, degrade significantly when km with a 99,7% confidence level -- corresponding to a graviton mass bigger than eV. This is a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
