Open Source Software for Efficient and Transparent Reviews
Rens van de Schoot, Jonathan de Bruin, Raoul Schram, Parisa Zahedi,, Jan de Boer, Felix Weijdema, Bianca Kramer, Martijn Huijts, Maarten, Hoogerwerf, Gerbrich Ferdinands, Albert Harkema, Joukje Willemsen, Yongchao, Ma, Qixiang Fang, Sybren Hindriks, Lars Tummers, Daniel Oberski

TL;DR
This paper introduces ASReview, an open source machine learning tool that significantly improves the efficiency and transparency of screening studies for systematic reviews and meta-analyses through active learning.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel open source pipeline using active learning to enhance systematic review screening, demonstrating superior efficiency over manual methods.
Findings
ASReview outperforms manual screening in efficiency.
High-quality results comparable to traditional methods.
Open source software encourages community contributions.
Abstract
To help researchers conduct a systematic review or meta-analysis as efficiently and transparently as possible, we designed a tool (ASReview) to accelerate the step of screening titles and abstracts. For many tasks - including but not limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses - the scientific literature needs to be checked systematically. Currently, scholars and practitioners screen thousands of studies by hand to determine which studies to include in their review or meta-analysis. This is error prone and inefficient because of extremely imbalanced data: only a fraction of the screened studies is relevant. The future of systematic reviewing will be an interaction with machine learning algorithms to deal with the enormous increase of available text. We therefore developed an open source machine learning-aided pipeline applying active learning: ASReview. We demonstrate by means of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
