Upper and Lower bounds for matrix discrepancy
Jiaxin Xie, Zhiqiang Xu, Ziheng Zhu

TL;DR
This paper establishes new bounds for the matrix discrepancy problem, improving previous bounds and providing exact values in specific cases, advancing understanding of matrix balancing with random variables.
Contribution
The paper proves an improved universal bound of 3 for matrix discrepancy and determines exact discrepancy values for certain tight frames with Rademacher variables.
Findings
Proved as an upper bound for matrix discrepancy.
Calculated exact discrepancy for specific tight frames with Rademacher variables.
Established a lower bound of 2 for the discrepancy in certain cases.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study the matrix discrepancy problem. Assume that are independent scalar random variables with finite support and . Let be the minimal constant for which the following holds: \[ {\rm Disc}(\mathbf{u}_1\mathbf{u}_1^*,\ldots,\mathbf{u}_n\mathbf{u}_n^*; \xi_1,\ldots,\xi_n)\,\,:=\,\,\min_{\varepsilon_1\in \mathcal{S}_1,\ldots,\varepsilon_n\in \mathcal{S}_n}\bigg\|\sum_{i=1}^n\mathbb{E}[\xi_i]\mathbf{u}_i\mathbf{u}_i^*-\sum_{i=1}^n\varepsilon_i\mathbf{u}_i\mathbf{u}_i^*\bigg\|\leq \mathcal{C}_0\cdot\sigma, \] where and denotes the support of . Motivated by the technology developed by Bownik, Casazza, Marcus, and Speegle, we prove .…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Approximation and Integration · Analytic Number Theory Research · Random Matrices and Applications
