Interpreting a field in its Heisenberg group
Rachael Alvir, Wesley Calvert, Grant Goodman, Valentina Harizanov,, Julia Knight, Andrey Morozov, Russell Miller, Alexandra Soskova, and Rose, Weisshaar

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a field can be interpreted within its Heisenberg group using parameter-free computable formulas, improving upon a 1960 result by Maltsev and providing explicit definitions.
Contribution
It generalizes Maltsev's result by eliminating parameters and providing explicit formulas for interpreting a field in its Heisenberg group.
Findings
Field $F$ is interpretable in $H(F)$ with parameter-free $\Sigma_1$ formulas.
Two proofs are provided: an existence proof and a direct explicit construction.
Conditions for eliminating parameters from interpretations are established.
Abstract
We improve on and generalize a 1960 result of Maltsev. For a field , we denote by the Heisenberg group with entries in . Maltsev showed that there is a copy of defined in , using existential formulas with an arbitrary non-commuting pair as parameters. We show that is interpreted in using computable formulas with no parameters. We give two proofs. The first is an existence proof, relying on a result of Harrison-Trainor, Melnikov, R. Miller, and Montalb\'an. This proof allows the possibility that the elements of are represented by tuples in of no fixed arity. The second proof is direct, giving explicit finitary existential formulas that define the interpretation, with elements of represented by triples in . Looking at what was used to arrive at this parameter-free interpretation of in , we give general…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
