A Fractional $3n+1$ Conjecture
\'Eric Brier, R\'emi G\'eraud-Stewart, David Naccache

TL;DR
This paper introduces a real-number sequence inspired by the Collatz conjecture, conjectures its long-term behavior, and proves it for initial values between 0 and 100, inviting further proof or refutation.
Contribution
The paper proposes a new fractional variant of the 3n+1 problem, conjectures its behavior, and proves the conjecture for initial values in a specific range, offering a reward for a complete proof.
Findings
Sequence likely converges to zero or enters a specific cycle
Proven for initial values in [0, 100]
Conjecture remains open for larger values
Abstract
In this paper we introduce and discuss the sequence of \emph{real numbers} defined as and where \begin{equation*} \Delta(x) = \begin{cases} \frac{x}{2} &\text{if } \operatorname{frac}(x)<\frac{1}{2} \\[4px] \frac{3x+1}{2} & \text{if } \operatorname{frac}(x)\geq\frac{1}{2} \end{cases} \end{equation*} This sequence is reminiscent of the famous Collatz sequence, and seems to exhibit an interesting behaviour. Indeed, we conjecture that iterating will eventually either converge to zero, or loop over sequences of real numbers with integer parts . We prove this conjecture for . Extending the proof to larger fixed values seems to be a matter of computing power. The authors pledge to offer a reward to the first person who proves or refutes the conjecture…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Coding theory and cryptography · Advanced Mathematical Identities
