Envy-freeness up to one item: Shall we add or remove resources?
Martin Aleksandrov

TL;DR
This paper introduces new fairness axioms for dividing indivisible items, showing that EFX+- and PO allocations exist where previous fairness notions do not, and establishes related impossibility results.
Contribution
It proposes EF1+- and EFX+- axioms, demonstrating their existence and compatibility with Pareto optimality in cases where traditional fairness allocations fail.
Findings
EF1+- and EFX+- allocations often exist where EF1 and EFX do not
EFX+- and PO allocations always exist when EFX and PO do not
Several new impossibility and incompatibility results are proved
Abstract
We consider a fair division model in which agents have general valuations for bundles of indivisible items. We propose two new axiomatic properties for allocations in this model: EF1+- and EFX+-. We compare these with the existing EF1 and EFX. Although EF1 and EF1+- allocations often exist, our results assert eloquently that EFX+- and PO allocations exist in each case where EFX and PO allocations do not exist. Additionally, we prove several new impossibility and incompatibility results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
