Non-repudiable provenance for clinical decision support systems
Elliot Fairweather, Rudolf Wittner, Martin Chapman, Petr Holub, Vasa, Curcin

TL;DR
This paper introduces modules to produce non-repudiable data provenance in clinical decision support systems, ensuring trustworthiness and integrity of data through traceability and evidence generation.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach with modules for tracing provenance service operations and generating evidence for non-repudiation, applied in a clinical decision support context.
Findings
Effective provenance tracing of service calls
Successful evidence generation for non-repudiation
Performance evaluation across different notary providers
Abstract
Provenance templates are now a recognised methodology for the construction of data provenance records. Each template defines the provenance of a domain-specific action in abstract form, which may then be instantiated as required by a single call to the provenance template service. As data reliability and trustworthiness becomes a critical issue in an increasing number of domains, there is a corresponding need to ensure that the provenance of that data is non-repudiable. In this paper we contribute two new, complementary modules to our template model and implementation to produce non-repudiable data provenance. The first, a module that traces the operation of the provenance template service itself, and records a provenance trace of the construction of an object-level document, at the level of individual service calls. The second, a non-repudiation module that generates evidence for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
