A general framework for defining and optimizing robustness
Alessandro Tibo, Manfred Jaeger, Kim G. Larsen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive, mathematically rigorous framework for defining and optimizing various robustness properties of classifiers, applicable across different models and robustness objectives.
Contribution
It proposes a general, model-agnostic robustness framework based on foundational postulates, and develops new neural network co-training methods for specific robustness goals.
Findings
Framework applicable to any classification model
New co-training strategies for robustness optimization
Addresses robustness from safety to transferability
Abstract
Robustness of neural networks has recently attracted a great amount of interest. The many investigations in this area lack a precise common foundation of robustness concepts. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a rigorous and flexible framework for defining different types of robustness properties for classifiers. Our robustness concept is based on postulates that robustness of a classifier should be considered as a property that is independent of accuracy, and that it should be defined in purely mathematical terms without reliance on algorithmic procedures for its measurement. We develop a very general robustness framework that is applicable to any type of classification model, and that encompasses relevant robustness concepts for investigations ranging from safety against adversarial attacks to transferability of models to new domains. For two prototypical, distinct robustness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research
