A comparison of quasar emission reconstruction techniques for $z\geq5.0$ Lyman-$\alpha$ and Lyman-$\beta$ transmission
S. E. I. Bosman, D. \v{D}urov\v{c}\'ikov\'a, F. B. Davies, A. C., Eilers

TL;DR
This study systematically compares eight quasar continuum reconstruction techniques to improve the accuracy of Lyman-alpha and beta transmission measurements at high redshifts, crucial for understanding the early universe.
Contribution
It evaluates and compares multiple reconstruction methods on a unified dataset, introducing two new PCA techniques that outperform existing methods in accuracy.
Findings
Power-law and PCA with few components show large biases.
Power-law extrapolations have higher scatter than previously thought.
New PCA methods achieve 9% accuracy for Ly-alpha and 17% for Ly-beta.
Abstract
Reconstruction techniques for intrinsic quasar continua are crucial for the precision study of Lyman- (Ly-) and Lyman- (Ly-) transmission at , where the emission of quasars is nearly completely absorbed. While the number and quality of spectroscopic observations has become theoretically sufficient to quantify Ly- transmission at to better than , the biases and uncertainties arising from predicting the unabsorbed continuum are not known to the same level. In this paper, we systematically evaluate eight reconstruction techniques on a unified testing sample of quasars drawn from eBOSS. The methods include power-law extrapolation, stacking of neighbours, and six variants of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using direct projection, fitting of components, or neural networks to perform weight mapping.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
