Dimits shift, avalanche-like bursts, and Solitary propagating structures in the two-field Flux-Balanced Hasegawa-Wakatani model for plasma edge turbulence
Di Qi, Andrew J. Majda, Antoine J. Cerfon

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the two-field flux-balanced Hasegawa-Wakatani model captures key features of drift-wave turbulence, including the Dimits shift, avalanche bursts, and solitary structures, aligning with gyrokinetic simulation observations.
Contribution
The study shows that the BHW model reproduces critical turbulence phenomena, emphasizing the importance of electron dynamics and boundary conditions, which are often missing in simpler models.
Findings
BHW model captures the Dimits shift and avalanche-like bursts.
Strong soliton-like solutions appear only in channel geometry.
Domain aspect ratio influences multiscale dynamics and jet interactions.
Abstract
We show that the recently introduced two-field flux-balanced Hasegawa-Wakatani (BHW) model captures the key features of drift-wave turbulent transport mediated by zonal flows observed in more complete and accurate gyrokinetic simulations, such as the existence of a nonlinear upshift of the threshold for drift wave turbulence driven transport, often called the Dimits shift, as well as non-local transport with avalanche bursts and solitary propagating structures. Because of the approximations made in the BHW model, these observations are made for the particle flux instead of the heat flux more commonly studied in ion temperature gradient (ITG) driven turbulence in fluid or gyrokinetic codes. Many of these features are not seen in other Hasegawa-Wakatani models, which confirms the critical role of the electron dynamics parallel to the magnetic field lines. To address questions regarding…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
