Reinforcement Learning as Iterative and Amortised Inference
Beren Millidge, Alexander Tschantz, Anil K Seth, Christopher L Buckley

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel classification of reinforcement learning algorithms based on iterative and amortised inference, offering a unified perspective and revealing unexplored design spaces for future research.
Contribution
It proposes a new classification scheme for RL algorithms using control as inference, highlighting similarities and unexplored areas in algorithmic design.
Findings
Many RL algorithms can be classified under the new scheme
The perspective reveals similarities across different RL techniques
Identifies unexplored algorithmic design spaces for future research
Abstract
There are several ways to categorise reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, such as either model-based or model-free, policy-based or planning-based, on-policy or off-policy, and online or offline. Broad classification schemes such as these help provide a unified perspective on disparate techniques and can contextualise and guide the development of new algorithms. In this paper, we utilise the control as inference framework to outline a novel classification scheme based on amortised and iterative inference. We demonstrate that a wide range of algorithms can be classified in this manner providing a fresh perspective and highlighting a range of existing similarities. Moreover, we show that taking this perspective allows us to identify parts of the algorithmic design space which have been relatively unexplored, suggesting new routes to innovative RL algorithms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics · Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications · Neural Networks and Applications
