"EHLO WORLD" -- Checking If Your Conversational AI Knows Right from Wrong
Elayne Ruane, Vivek Nallur

TL;DR
This paper explores methods for evaluating and validating the ethical claims of conversational AI, proposing a hybrid framework combining top-down regulations and bottom-up processes, demonstrated through a customer service chatbot case study.
Contribution
It introduces a hybrid approach to assess AI ethics, integrating regulatory and practical methods, with a detailed example of implementation in customer service chatbots.
Findings
Hybrid framework effectively combines top-down and bottom-up methods.
Proposed processes support ethical validation across multiple AI use-cases.
Framework facilitates ethical consistency and adaptability in conversational AI.
Abstract
In this paper we discuss approaches to evaluating and validating the ethical claims of a Conversational AI system. We outline considerations around both a top-down regulatory approach and bottom-up processes. We describe the ethical basis for each approach and propose a hybrid which we demonstrate by taking the case of a customer service chatbot as an example. We speculate on the kinds of top-down and bottom-up processes that would need to exist for a hybrid framework to successfully function as both an enabler as well as a shepherd among multiple use-cases and multiple competing AI solutions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · AI in Service Interactions
