On Frequency Response Function Identification for Advanced Motion Control
Enzo Evers, Robbert Voorhoeve, Tom Oomen

TL;DR
This paper reviews recent methods for accurate Frequency Response Function (FRF) identification in advanced motion control, addressing challenges in transient and closed-loop conditions through simulations and experiments.
Contribution
It introduces solutions for improving FRF identification accuracy under transient and closed-loop conditions in advanced motion control systems.
Findings
Enhanced FRF estimation methods for transient conditions
Validated techniques through simulation and experimental results
Insights into FRF identification challenges in closed-loop control
Abstract
A key step in control of precision mechatronic systems is Frequency Response Function (FRF) identification. The aim of this paper is to illustrate relevant developments and solutions for FRF identification for advanced motion control. Specifically dealing with transient and/or closed-loop conditions that can normally lead to inaccurate estimation results. This yields essential insights for FRF identification for advanced motion control that are illustrated through a simulation study and validated on an experimental setup.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsControl Systems and Identification · Iterative Learning Control Systems · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
