Optical estimation of unitary Gaussian processes without phase reference using Fock states
Changhun Oh, Kimin Park, Radim Filip, Hyunseok Jeong, and Petr Marek

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Fock states enable efficient, phase-reference-free estimation of displacement and squeezing in Gaussian processes, outperforming Gaussian states especially at low energies and allowing simultaneous parameter estimation.
Contribution
It introduces a method using photon number states for phase-insensitive estimation of Gaussian processes, surpassing Gaussian states in accuracy and enabling joint parameter estimation.
Findings
Fock states outperform Gaussian states in displacement estimation at all energies.
Estimation errors can saturate the Cramér-Rao bound with realistic losses.
Simultaneous estimation of displacement and squeezing is feasible with Fock states.
Abstract
Since a general Gaussian process is phase-sensitive, a stable phase reference is required to take advantage of this feature. When the reference is missing, either due to the volatile nature of the measured sample or the measurement's technical limitations, the resulting process appears as random in phase. Under this condition, we consider two single-mode Gaussian processes, displacement and squeezing. We show that these two can be efficiently estimated using photon number states and photon number resolving detectors. For separate estimation of displacement and squeezing, the practical estimation errors for hundreds of probes' ensembles can saturate the Cram\'{e}r-Rao bound even for arbitrary small values of the estimated parameters and under realistic losses. The estimation of displacement with Fock states always outperforms estimation using Gaussian states with equivalent energy and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
