Parameterised post-Newtonian formalism for the effective field theory of dark energy via screened reconstructed Horndeski theories
Cyril Renevey, Joe Kennedy, Lucas Lombriser

TL;DR
This paper connects the parameterised post-Newtonian formalism with the effective field theory of dark energy within Horndeski theories, enabling comprehensive tests of gravity across scales by reconstructing models with screening mechanisms.
Contribution
It introduces a method to reconstruct Horndeski theories from EFT functions and derive PPN parameters, linking large-scale cosmological and astrophysical tests of gravity.
Findings
Derived PPN parameters for reconstructed models with screening mechanisms.
Established conditions for models to have significant cosmological modifications while satisfying astrophysical bounds.
Performed post-Newtonian expansion to connect theory with observational tests.
Abstract
We bring together two popular formalisms which generically parameterise deviations from General Relativity on astrophysical and cosmological scales, namely the parameterised post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism and the effective field theory (EFT) of dark energy and modified gravity. These separate formalisms are successfully applied to independently perform tests of gravity in their respective regimes of applicability on vastly different length scales. Nonlinear screening mechanisms indeed make it imperative to probe General Relativity across a wide range of scales. For a comprehensive interpretation of the complementary measurements it is important to connect them to effectively constrain the vast gravitational model space. We establish such a connection within the framework of Horndeski scalar-tensor theories restricted to a luminal propagation speed of gravitational waves. This is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
