Multi-Agent Programming Contest 2019 FIT BUT Team solution
Vaclav Uhlir, Frantisek Zboril, Frantisek Vidensky

TL;DR
This paper presents two distinct multi-agent systems developed for the MAPC 2019 competition, one proactive with goal assignment and one reactive with dynamic behavior, demonstrating different approaches to multi-agent coordination.
Contribution
It introduces and compares a proactive goal-oriented system and a reactive layered architecture for multi-agent coordination in competitive scenarios.
Findings
Proactive system assigns goals based on roles and scenarios.
Reactive system employs layered architecture for dynamic decision-making.
Both systems were designed specifically for the MAPC 2019 competition.
Abstract
During our participation in MAPC 2019, we have developed two multi-agent systems that have been designed specifically for this competition. The first of the systems is pro-active system that works with pre-specified scenarios and tasks agents with generated goals designed for individual agents according to assigned role. The second system is designed as more reactive and employs layered architecture with highly dynamic behaviour, where agents select their own action based on their perception of usefulness of said action.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
