Aligning with Heterogeneous Preferences for Kidney Exchange
Rachel Freedman

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for kidney exchange algorithms to incorporate diverse community preferences by learning and sampling preference distributions, improving alignment with group values.
Contribution
It proposes a novel approach to aggregate heterogeneous moral preferences in kidney exchange through learned preference distributions and dynamic sampling.
Findings
Increased average rank of matched patients in sampled preferences
Method aligns kidney exchange decisions with community moral values
Demonstrated effectiveness through empirical evaluation
Abstract
AI algorithms increasingly make decisions that impact entire groups of humans. Since humans tend to hold varying and even conflicting preferences, AI algorithms responsible for making decisions on behalf of such groups encounter the problem of preference aggregation: combining inconsistent and sometimes contradictory individual preferences into a representative aggregate. In this paper, we address this problem in a real-world public health context: kidney exchange. The algorithms that allocate kidneys from living donors to patients needing transplants in kidney exchange matching markets should prioritize patients in a way that aligns with the values of the community they serve, but allocation preferences vary widely across individuals. In this paper, we propose, implement and evaluate a methodology for prioritizing patients based on such heterogeneous moral preferences. Instead of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOrgan Donation and Transplantation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Economic and Environmental Valuation
