Remarks on cosmological bulk viscosity in different epochs
Iver Brevik, Ben David Normann

TL;DR
This paper explores a numerical similarity between early and present-day bulk viscosities in cosmology, proposes a unifying functional form, and examines the compatibility of bulk viscosity with anisotropic Kasner universes.
Contribution
It introduces a simple analytical formula for bulk viscosity that links early and late universe cosmology and analyzes its compatibility with anisotropic models like Kasner universes.
Findings
Bulk viscosity in the early universe matches present-day calculations with a $ ho^{1/2}$ dependence.
Shear viscosity is incompatible with the Kasner model, but bulk viscosity is compatible with isotropic models.
In a stiff fluid, Kasner exponents are determined solely by bulk viscosity.
Abstract
The intention of this paper is mainly two-fold. \textit{First}, we point out a striking numerical agreement between the bulk viscosity in the lepton era calculated by Husdal (2016) and our own calculations of the present-day bulk viscosity when the functional form is . From a phenomenological point of view, we thus seem to have an ansatz for the viscosity which bridges the infancy of the Universe ( s) with the present. This can also be looked upon as a kind of symmetry between the early-time cosmology and the present-day cosmology: it is quite remarkable that the kinetic theory-based bulk viscosity in the early universe and the experimentally-based bulk viscosity in the present universe can be covered by the same simple analytical formula. \textit{Second}, we consider the Kasner universe as a typical anisotropic model of Bianchi-type I, investigating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
