Empirical completeness assessment of the Gaia DR2, Pan-STARRS 1 and ASAS-SN-II RR Lyrae catalogues
Cecilia Mateu (1), Berry Holl (2), Joris de Ridder (3), Lorenzo, Rimoldini (2), ((1) UdelaR, Montevideo (2) University of Geneva (3) UK, Leuven)

TL;DR
This study empirically evaluates the completeness of the three largest RR Lyrae star catalogues—Gaia DR2, Pan-STARRS-1, and ASAS-SN-II—using probabilistic analysis to produce detailed 2D and 3D completeness maps across different magnitudes and galactic latitudes.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive empirical assessment and detailed completeness maps of these major RR Lyrae catalogues, highlighting their strengths and limitations.
Findings
Gaia DR2 is over 95% complete for bright RR Lyrae stars outside the ecliptic.
ASAS-SN-II has the best completeness at low latitudes for RRab stars.
PanSTARRS-1 maintains high completeness (~91%) down to G~18, with lower completeness at low galactic latitudes.
Abstract
RR Lyrae stars are an important and widely used tracer of the most ancient populations of our Galaxy, mainly due to their standard candle nature. The availability of large scale surveys of variable stars is allowing us to trace the structure of our entire Galaxy, even in previously inaccessible areas like the Galactic disc. In this work we aim to provide an empirical assessment of the completeness of the three largest RR Lyrae catalogues available: Gaia DR2, PanSTARRS-1 and ASAS-SN-II. Using a joint probabilistic analysis of the three surveys we compute 2D and 3D completeness maps in each survey's full magnitude range. At the bright end (G<13) we find ASAS-SN-II and Gaia are near 100% complete in RRab at high latitude (|b|>20deg); ASAS-SN-II has the best completeness at low latitude for RRab and at all latitudes for RRc. At the faint end (G>13), Gaia DR2 is the most complete catalogue…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
