Not even the air of empty spaces is coronavirus free (Two meters is not a safe distance)
Edilson Crema

TL;DR
This paper argues that due to airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the commonly recommended two-meter distancing is insufficient, emphasizing the importance of masks, protective glasses, and environmental controls to reduce spread.
Contribution
It provides theoretical calculations and empirical evidence showing the persistence of airborne virus particles and challenges the safety of current distancing guidelines.
Findings
Virus remains active in suspended droplets for hours
High humidity prolongs virus survival outdoors
Air conditioning and heating increase contagion risk
Abstract
A key safety measure encouraged by health authorities to avoid the SARS-CoV-2 spreading is the distance of one to two meters between people. This recommended two-meters distance is mainly based on short-distance contagion, when infected drops are expelled during a speech, coughing, or sneezing and directly hit another person. The dangerous form of airway contamination caused by droplets that remain suspended in the air for several hours has been almost ignored. However, the theoretical calculations performed in this work, recent experiments, and the accumulated knowledge in this and other epidemics indicate that, because of the airborne transmission, there is no safe distance to the coronavirus, either indoors or in open places. Recent investigations have confirmed not only the presence of the coronavirus in droplets suspended in the air but that these viruses remain active for several…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 and Mental Health · Infection Control and Ventilation
