TL;DR
This paper introduces a causal modeling framework for intersectional fairness in ranking systems, enabling more transparent and domain-aware fair ranking methods with experimental validation on real and synthetic data.
Contribution
It presents a novel causal approach to intersectional fairness in ranking, addressing a gap in causal inference and fairness literature.
Findings
Effective in modeling intersectional fairness
Demonstrates flexibility across different tasks
Reveals limitations under certain assumptions
Abstract
In this paper we propose a causal modeling approach to intersectional fairness, and a flexible, task-specific method for computing intersectionally fair rankings. Rankings are used in many contexts, ranging from Web search results to college admissions, but causal inference for fair rankings has received limited attention. Additionally, the growing literature on causal fairness has directed little attention to intersectionality. By bringing these issues together in a formal causal framework we make the application of intersectionality in fair machine learning explicit, connected to important real world effects and domain knowledge, and transparent about technical limitations. We experimentally evaluate our approach on real and synthetic datasets, exploring its behaviour under different structural assumptions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsCausal inference
