High-redshift Extreme Variability Quasars from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Multi-Epoch Spectroscopy
Hengxiao Guo, Jiacheng Peng, Kaiwen Zhang, Colin J. Burke, Xin Liu,, Mouyuan Sun, Shu Wang, Minzhi Kong, Zhenfeng Sheng, Tinggui Wang, Zhicheng, He, and Minfeng Gu

TL;DR
This study systematically identifies high-redshift extreme variability quasars (EVQs) over 18 years, revealing their similarities to changing-look quasars and analyzing their spectral variability, black hole mass estimates, and physical properties.
Contribution
It provides the first large sample of high-redshift EVQs, demonstrating their connection to low-redshift changing-look quasars and analyzing their spectral and physical variability mechanisms.
Findings
348 EVQs identified with >100% variability
23 EVQs show emission line disappearance, akin to CLQs
Extreme variability introduces ~0.3 dex scatter in black hole mass estimates
Abstract
We perform a systematic search for high-redshift ( 1.5) extreme variability quasars (EVQs) using repeat spectra from the Sixteenth Data Release of Sloan Digital Sky Survey, which provides a baseline spanning up to 18 yrs in the observed frame. We compile a sample of 348 EVQs with a maximum continuum variability at rest frame 1450 Angstrom of more than 100% (i.e., V (MaxMin)/Mean 1). The EVQs show a range of emission line variability, including 23 where at least one line in our redshift range disappears below detectability, which can then be seen as analogous to low-redshift changing-look quasars (CLQs)". Importantly, spurious CLQs caused by SDSS problematic spectral flux calibration, e.g., fiber drop issue, have been rejected. The similar properties (e.g., continuum/line, difference-composite spectra and Eddington ratio) of normal EVQs and CLQs, implies…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
