Bell's Theorem, Quantum Probabilities, and Superdeterminism
Eddy Keming Chen

TL;DR
This paper surveys Bell's theorem and explores alternative interpretations like quantum probabilities and superdeterminism, addressing their implications for non-locality and philosophical debates in quantum mechanics.
Contribution
It provides a concise overview of strategies challenging Bell's theorem, highlighting their philosophical significance and potential to reinterpret quantum non-locality.
Findings
Quantum probabilities offer alternative explanations to non-locality.
Superdeterminism challenges assumptions in Bell's theorem.
The issues have broad implications for quantum foundations and philosophy.
Abstract
In this short survey article, I discuss Bell's theorem and some strategies that attempt to avoid the conclusion of non-locality. I focus on two that intersect with the philosophy of probability: (1) quantum probabilities and (2) superdeterminism. The issues they raised not only apply to a wide class of no-go theorems about quantum mechanics but are also of general philosophical interest.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy and History of Science · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
