Improved Algorithm for Permutation Testing

TL;DR

This paper introduces an efficient adaptive algorithm for testing (1,3,2)-freeness in sequences, significantly reducing query complexity compared to previous methods by leveraging a new pattern structure.

Contribution

The paper presents the first adaptive testing algorithm for (1,3,2)-freeness with substantially improved query complexity using a novel pattern structure.

Findings

Query complexity reduced to O(ε^{-2} log^4 n)

Significant improvement over previous O(ε^{-7} log^{26} n) algorithms

Introduces a new pattern structure for testing permutation freeness

Abstract

For a permutation $\pi: [K]\rightarrow [K]$, a sequence $f: \{1,2,\cdots, n\}\rightarrow \mathbb R$ contains a $\pi$-pattern of size $K$, if there is a sequence of indices $(i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_K)$ ($i_1<i_2<\cdots<i_K$), satisfying that $f(i_a)<f(i_b)$ if $\pi(a)<\pi(b)$, for $a,b\in [K]$. Otherwise, $f$ is referred to as $\pi$-free. For the special case where $\pi = (1,2,\cdots, K)$, it is referred to as the monotone pattern. \cite{newman2017testing} initiated the study of testing $\pi$-freeness with one-sided error. They focused on two specific problems, testing the monotone permutations and the $(1,3,2)$ permutation. For the problem of testing monotone permutation $(1,2,\cdots,K)$, \cite{ben2019finding} improved the $(\log n)^{O(K^2)}$ non-adaptive query complexity of \cite{newman2017testing} to $O((\log n)^{\lfloor \log_{2} K\rfloor})$. Further, \cite{ben2019optimal} proposed an adaptive algorithm with $O(\log n)$ query complexity. However, no progress has yet been made on the problem of testing $(1,3,2)$-freeness. In this work, we present an adaptive algorithm for testing $(1,3,2)$-freeness. The query complexity of our algorithm is $O(\epsilon^{-2}\log^4 n)$, which significantly improves over the $O(\epsilon^{-7}\log^{26}n)$-query adaptive algorithm of \cite{newman2017testing}. This improvement is mainly achieved by the proposal of a new structure embedded in the patterns.