A Truncation Error Analysis of Third-Order MUSCL Scheme for Nonlinear Conservation Laws
Hiroaki Nishikawa

TL;DR
This paper rigorously proves that the third-order MUSCL scheme can achieve third-order accuracy for nonlinear conservation laws through detailed truncation error analysis and numerical verification.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous proof of third-order accuracy for the MUSCL scheme, clarifying previous misconceptions and guiding correct analysis for nonlinear conservation laws.
Findings
MUSCL scheme achieves third-order accuracy with kappa=1/3
Reconstructed face solutions recover cubic solutions exactly
Third-order accuracy verified by numerical experiments
Abstract
This paper is a rebuttal to the claim found in the literature that the MUSCL scheme cannot be third-order accurate for nonlinear conservation laws. We provide a rigorous proof for third-order accuracy of the MUSCL scheme based on a careful and detailed truncation error analysis. Throughout the analysis, the distinction between the cell average and the point value will be strictly made for the numerical solution as well as for the target operator. It is shown that the average of the solutions reconstructed at a face by Van Leer's kappa-scheme recovers a cubic solution exactly with kappa = 1/3, the same is true for the average of the nonlinear fluxes evaluated by the reconstructed solutions, and a dissipation term is already sufficiently small with a third-order truncation error. Finally, noting that the target spatial operator is a cell-averaged flux derivative, we prove that the leading…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
