A VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization
Sarfaraz Zolfani, Morteza Yazdani, Dragan Pamucar, Pascale Zarat\'e, (IRIT-ADRIA, IRIT, UT1)

TL;DR
This paper reanalyzes the MADM methods VIKOR and TOPSIS using a novel logarithmic normalization technique, comparing results with classical methods and assessing the impact on decision-making outcomes.
Contribution
Introduces the application of logarithmic normalization to MADM methods VIKOR and TOPSIS, highlighting differences and reliability in decision analysis.
Findings
Logarithmic normalization affects MADM results.
Differences observed between classical and LN-based methods.
Sensitivity analysis confirms result reliability.
Abstract
Decision and policy-makers in multi-criteria decision-making analysis take into account some strategies in order to analyze outcomes and to finally make an effective and more precise decision. Among those strategies, the modification of the normalization process in the multiple-criteria decision-making algorithm is still a question due to the confrontation of many normalization tools. Normalization is the basic action in defining and solving a MADM problem and a MADM model. Normalization is the first, also necessary, step in solving, i.e. the application of a MADM method. It is a fact that the selection of normalization methods has a direct effect on the results. One of the latest normalization methods introduced is the Logarithmic Normalization (LN) method. This new method has a distinguished advantage, reflecting in that a sum of the normalized values of criteria always equals 1. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
