TL;DR
This paper compares seven models of bacterial transcription regulation, demonstrating how equilibrium and kinetic approaches can predict gene expression levels and highlighting the two-state model with burst size distribution as most effective.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates seven distinct models of the simple-repression motif, clarifying their predictive power and limitations in describing transcriptional regulation.
Findings
Equilibrium models can often predict mean gene expression accurately.
Kinetic models provide insights into variance and distribution of gene expression.
The two-state model with burst size distribution best fits experimental data.
Abstract
The study of transcription remains one of the centerpieces of modern biology with implications in settings from development to metabolism to evolution to disease. Precision measurements using a host of different techniques including fluorescence and sequencing readouts have raised the bar for what it means to quantitatively understand transcriptional regulation. In particular our understanding of the simplest genetic circuit is sufficiently refined both experimentally and theoretically that it has become possible to carefully discriminate between different conceptual pictures of how this regulatory system works. This regulatory motif, originally posited by Jacob and Monod in the 1960s, consists of a single transcriptional repressor binding to a promoter site and inhibiting transcription. In this paper, we show how seven distinct models of this so-called simple-repression motif, based…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
