Top influencers can be identified universally by combining classical centralities
Doina Bucur

TL;DR
Combining multiple classical centrality measures through statistical classifiers reliably identifies top influencers across diverse networks, outperforming individual indicators.
Contribution
This study demonstrates that using combined centralities in classifiers improves the prediction of top spreaders in networks, revealing effective pairs of local and global centralities.
Findings
Classifiers with multiple centralities achieve high accuracy (0.995) in identifying top spreaders.
Pairs of local and global centralities work synergistically to improve ranking.
Seven classical centralities suffice for near-optimal influence prediction.
Abstract
Information flow, opinion, and epidemics spread over structured networks. When using individual node centrality indicators to predict which nodes will be among the top influencers or spreaders in a large network, no single centrality has consistently good ranking power. We show that statistical classifiers using two or more centralities as input are instead consistently predictive over many diverse, static real-world topologies. Certain pairs of centralities cooperate particularly well in statistically drawing the boundary between the top spreaders and the rest: local centralities measuring the size of a node's neighbourhood benefit from the addition of a global centrality such as the eigenvector centrality, closeness, or the core number. This is, intuitively, because a local centrality may rank highly some nodes which are located in dense, but peripheral regions of the network---a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
