Data-driven determination of the spin Hamiltonian parameters and their uncertainties: The case of the zigzag-chain compound KCu$_4$P$_3$O$_{12}$
Ryo Tamura, Koji Hukushima, Akira Matsuo, Koichi Kindo, Masashi Hase

TL;DR
This paper introduces a data-driven method to estimate spin Hamiltonian parameters and their uncertainties from experimental magnetic data, applied to the compound KCu$_4$P$_3$O$_{12}$, enabling accurate modeling of its magnetic properties.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel technique for determining spin Hamiltonian parameters and uncertainties directly from experimental data, specifically applied to a zigzag-chain compound.
Findings
Effective model with specific exchange parameters and uncertainties was obtained.
The method successfully estimates uncertainties via noise analysis.
The model predicts properties like spin gap and magnetic entropy.
Abstract
We propose a data-driven technique to estimate the spin Hamiltonian, including uncertainty, from multiple physical quantities. Using our technique, an effective model of KCuPO is determined from the experimentally observed magnetic susceptibility and magnetization curves with various temperatures under high magnetic fields. An effective model, which is the quantum Heisenberg model on a zigzag chain with eight spins having J_1= -8.54 \pm 0.51 \{\rm meV}, J_2 = -2.67 \pm 1.13 \{\rm meV}, J_3 = -3.90 \pm 0.15 \{\rm meV}, and J_4 = 6.24 \pm 0.95 \{\rm meV}, describes these measured results well. These uncertainties are successfully determined by the noise estimation. The relations among the estimated magnetic interactions or physical quantities are also discussed. The obtained effective model is useful to predict hard-to-measure properties such as spin gap, spin…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
