The ADF and the t$^2$ formalism in H II regions based on the upper mass limit of the IMF for the MW
L. Carigi, A. Peimbert, M. Peimbert, and G. Delgado-Inglada

TL;DR
This study investigates how the upper mass limit of the initial mass function influences predicted element abundances in the Milky Way's H II regions, comparing models with observations to constrain M$_{ m up}$.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach by analyzing the impact of M$_{ m up}$ on chemical abundances using both direct and temperature independent methods, providing new constraints on the IMF upper mass limit.
Findings
DM predicts M$_{ m up}$ = 25-45 M$_{ m \,odot}$
TIM predicts M$_{ m up}$ = 70-110 M$_{ m \,odot}$
Galaxies similar to the MW have M$_{ m up} \,\sim 100$ M$_{ m \,odot}$
Abstract
We study in depth the abundance discrepancy problem in H II regions, this time from a different perspective than the usual one: by studying the effect of the upper mass limit (M) of the initial mass function (IMF) on the O, C, and He predicted by chemical evolution models for the Milky Way. We use abundances determined with the direct method (DM) and with the temperature independent method (TIM). We compare the predicted abundances at the present time with observations of Orion, M17, and M8 to determine the M value of the galactic IMF. From the DM abundances, the models predict an M = 25-45 M, while from the TIM, CEMs derive an M = 70-110 M. Spiral galaxies with the stellar mass and star formation rate of the MW are predicted to have an M M. These results support that abundances derived from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
