Learning from Label Proportions: A Mutual Contamination Framework
Clayton Scott, Jianxin Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new framework for learning from label proportions using mutual contamination models, providing theoretical foundations and addressing limitations in existing experimental setups.
Contribution
It formulates LLP within MCMs, establishing unbiased losses, generalization bounds, and proposing a new experimental setting for better evaluation.
Findings
Unbiased loss functions for LLP under MCMs
Generalization error bounds for non-iid samples
A new experimental framework for LLP
Abstract
Learning from label proportions (LLP) is a weakly supervised setting for classification in which unlabeled training instances are grouped into bags, and each bag is annotated with the proportion of each class occurring in that bag. Prior work on LLP has yet to establish a consistent learning procedure, nor does there exist a theoretically justified, general purpose training criterion. In this work we address these two issues by posing LLP in terms of mutual contamination models (MCMs), which have recently been applied successfully to study various other weak supervision settings. In the process, we establish several novel technical results for MCMs, including unbiased losses and generalization error bounds under non-iid sampling plans. We also point out the limitations of a common experimental setting for LLP, and propose a new one based on our MCM framework.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Natural Language Processing Techniques
