TL;DR
This paper compares leading Lyα forest inversion methods, introduces a hybrid approach with regularization, and demonstrates improved accuracy and robustness in reconstructing the matter density field from synthetic data.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of existing inversion algorithms and develops a new regularized statistical method that enhances reconstruction accuracy with low complexity.
Findings
Gauss-Newton method is most accurate but complex and assumption-heavy.
Statistical approach is faster, robust, and performs well at low S/N.
The new regularized method outperforms previous approaches in accuracy at low S/N.
Abstract
We present a same-level comparison of the most prominent inversion methods for the reconstruction of the matter density field in the quasi-linear regime from the Ly forest flux. Moreover, we present a pathway for refining the reconstruction in the framework of numerical optimization. We apply this approach to construct a novel hybrid method. The methods which are used so far for matter reconstructions are the Richardson-Lucy algorithm, an iterative Gauss-Newton method and a statistical approach assuming a one-to-one correspondence between matter and flux. We study these methods for high spectral resolutions such that thermal broadening becomes relevant. The inversion methods are compared on synthetic data (generated with the lognormal approach) with respect to their performance, accuracy, their stability against noise, and their robustness against systematic uncertainties. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
