Heavy baryon wave functions, Bakamjian-Thomas approach to form factors, and observables in ${\Lambda_b \to \Lambda_c\left({1 \over 2}^\pm \right) \ell \overline{\nu}}$ transitions
D. Be\v{c}irevi\'c, A. Le Yaouanc, V. Mor\'enas, L. Oliver

TL;DR
This paper develops a quark model using the Bakamjian-Thomas formalism to calculate form factors and observables in Lambda_b to Lambda_c decays, testing lepton flavor universality and confronting challenges in modeling baryon structure.
Contribution
It introduces a phenomenological Q-pointlike-diquark model combined with the Bakamjian-Thomas approach to compute form factors and observables in heavy baryon decays, addressing limitations of standard models.
Findings
Extracted slope of IW function $ ho_ ext{Lambda}^2 \,\sim\, 2$ from lattice data.
Predicted large inelastic IW function, suggesting measurable inelastic decays at LHCb.
Identified zeroes in observables for specific $q^2$ in tau decays, offering tests of the Standard Model.
Abstract
Motivated by the calculation of observables in the decays , as tests of Lepton Flavor Universality, we present a calculation of form factors in the quark model. Our scheme combines a spectroscopic model, providing the internal wave functions, and the Bakamjian-Thomas relativistic formalism to deduce the wave functions in motion and current matrix elements, that amount in the heavy quark limit to the Isgur-Wise (IW) function. For baryons we meet difficulties using standard spectroscopic models, leading us to propose a simple phenomenological model : a Q-pointlike-diquark model, non-relativistic with harmonic oscillator forces, with a reasonable low-lying spectrum and good slope of the IW function. We extract this slope from Lattice data and find . We are not able to reproduce the right…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
