Can you take Akemann--Weaver's $\diamondsuit_{\aleph_1}$ away?
Daniel Calder\'on, Ilijas Farah

TL;DR
This paper constructs a counterexample to Naimark's problem using a weakened form of Jensen's diamond axiom, showing that certain simple C*-algebras can have exactly two inequivalent irreducible representations, thus challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that under a weaker set-theoretic assumption, a simple C*-algebra can have more than one irreducible representation, providing a negative answer to Naimark's problem.
Findings
Constructed a simple C*-algebra with exactly two inequivalent irreducible representations.
Showed that a weakened diamond principle suffices to negate Naimark's problem.
Developed a forcing technique to manipulate automorphisms of C*-algebras.
Abstract
By Glimm's dichotomy, a separable, simple -algebra has continuum-many unitarily inequivalent irreducible representations if, and only if, it is non-type I while all of its irreducible representations are unitarily equivalent if, and only if, it is type I. Naimark asked whether the latter equivalence holds for all -algebras. In 2004, Akemann and Weaver gave a negative answer to Naimark's problem, using Jensen's diamond axiom , a powerful diagonalization principle that implies the Continuum Hypothesis (). By a result of Rosenberg, a separably represented simple -algebra with a unique irreducible representation is necessarily of type I. We show that this result is sharp by constructing an example of a separably represented, simple -algebra that has exactly two inequivalent irreducible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra
