The Limits of Resolution and Dose for Aberration-Corrected Electron Tomography
Reed Yalisove, Suk Hyun Sung, Peter Ercius, and Robert Hovden

TL;DR
This paper establishes theoretical limits and practical methods for achieving unprecedented 3D resolution in aberration-corrected electron tomography, surpassing traditional constraints like the Crowther limit for large specimens.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical framework and demonstrates that aberration-corrected electron tomography can achieve atomic resolution in large 3D specimens, breaking previous resolution limits.
Findings
Aberration-corrected tomography surpasses the Crowther limit under certain tilt conditions.
Atomic 3D imaging is feasible for objects larger than 20nm using modest tilting.
The dose can be effectively fractionated across tilts without loss of resolution.
Abstract
Aberration-corrected electron microscopy can resolve the smallest atomic bond-lengths in nature. However, the high-convergence angles that enable spectacular resolution in 2D have unknown 3D resolution limits for all but the smallest objects (8nm). We show aberration-corrected electron tomography offers new limits for 3D imaging by measuring several focal planes at each specimen tilt. We present a theoretical foundation for aberration-corrected electron tomography by establishing analytic descriptions for resolution, sampling, object size, and dose---with direct analogy to the Crowther-Klug criterion. Remarkably, aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron tomography can measure complete 3D specimen structure of unbounded object sizes up to a specified cutoff resolution. This breaks the established Crowther limit when tilt increments are twice the convergence angle or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
