How simplifying and flexible is the simplifying assumption in pair-copula constructions -- analytic answers in dimension three and a glimpse beyond
Thomas Mroz, Sebastian Fuchs, Wolfgang Trutschnig

TL;DR
This paper investigates the flexibility and limitations of the simplifying assumption in pair-copula constructions, revealing that simplified copulas are dense under uniform metrics but not under stronger notions, and highlighting the discontinuity and approximation issues of partial vine copulas.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analytic study of the simplifying assumption in pair-copula models, addressing open questions and extending results beyond three dimensions.
Findings
Simplified copulas are dense in three dimensions under the uniform metric.
Partial vine copulas are not optimal approximations and can have large errors.
The mapping to partial vine copulas is discontinuous under the uniform metric.
Abstract
Motivated by the increasing popularity and the seemingly broad applicability of pair-copula constructions underlined by numerous publications in the last decade, in this contribution we tackle the unavoidable question on how flexible and simplifying the commonly used `simplifying assumption' is from an analytic perspective and provide answers to two related open questions posed by Nagler and Czado in 2016. Aiming at a simplest possible setup for deriving the main results we first focus on the three-dimensional setting. We prove that the family of simplified copulas is flexible in the sense that it is dense in the set of all three-dimensional co\-pulas with respect to the uniform metric - considering stronger notions of convergence like the one induced by the metric , by weak conditional convergence, by total variation, or by Kullback-Leibler divergence, however, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
