The Dead-Alive Physicist experiment: a case-study disproving the hypothesis that consciousness causes the wave-function collapse in the quantum measurement process
Carlo Roselli, Bruno Raffaele Stella

TL;DR
This paper presents a thought experiment called 'Dead-Alive Physicist' to empirically challenge the hypothesis that consciousness causes wave-function collapse, arguing that consciousness is not necessary for quantum measurement.
Contribution
It introduces a novel variation of Schrödinger's cat experiment involving a human observer to disprove the necessity of consciousness in quantum measurement.
Findings
Disproves the hypothesis that consciousness causes wave-function collapse
Supports alternative interpretations of quantum mechanics that do not require consciousness
Clarifies the relationship between observers and quantum objects
Abstract
This paper aims to falsify the hypothesis that the observer's consciousness is necessary for quantum measurement. To achieve our target, we propose a variation of the Schroedinger's cat thought experiment called "DAP", short for "Dead-Alive Physicist", in which a human being replaces the cat. This strategy enables us to logically disprove the consistency of the above hypothesis and to oblige its supporters either to be trapped in solipsism or to rely on an alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics in which the role of the conscious observer has to be reviewed. Our analysis hence provides support to clarify the relationship between the observer the objects of her/his experimental observation; this and a few other implications are discussed in the fourth section and in the conclusions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
