The Gaia-ESO survey: the non-universality of the age-chemical-clocks-metallicity relations in the Galactic disc
G. Casali, L. Spina, L. Magrini, A. Karakas, C. Kobayashi, A. R., Casey, S. Feltzing, M. Van der Swaelmen, M. Tsantaki, P. Jofr\'e, A., Bragaglia, D. Feuillet, T. Bensby, K. Biazzo, A. Gonneau, G. Tautvaisiene, M., Baratella, V. Roccatagliata, E. Pancino, S. Sousa, V. Adibekyan

TL;DR
This study investigates how stellar age-abundance relations vary across the Galactic disc, revealing that these relations are not universal but depend on location and star formation history, challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It provides empirical age-abundance relations for solar-like stars and demonstrates their non-universality across different Galactic regions, considering metallicity and star formation history effects.
Findings
Age-abundance relations vary with Galactocentric radius.
Clusters beyond 7 kpc show lower s-element content than models predict.
Star formation history and metallicity-dependent yields influence these relations.
Abstract
In the era of large spectroscopic surveys, massive databases of high-quality spectra provide tools to outline a new picture of our Galaxy. In this framework, an important piece of information is provided by our ability to infer stellar ages. We aim to provide empirical relations between stellar ages and abundance ratios for a sample of solar-like stars. We investigate the dependence on metallicity, and we apply our relations to Gaia-ESO samples of open clusters and field stars. We analyse high-resolution and high-S/N HARPS spectra of a sample of solar-like stars to obtain precise determinations of their atmospheric parameters and abundances through differential spectral analysis and age through isochrone fitting. We investigate the relations between ages and abundance ratios. For the abundance ratios with a steeper dependence on age, we perform multivariate linear regressions, including…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
