Non-iterative Modal Logics are Coalgebraic
Jonas Forster, Lutz Schr\"oder

TL;DR
This paper extends the coalgebraic semantics framework to non-iterative modal logics, establishing soundness and strong completeness, and illustrating with deontic logics that include factual detachment.
Contribution
It generalizes the coalgebraic semantics from rank-1 to non-iterative modal logics using copointed functors, ensuring soundness and strong completeness.
Findings
Non-iterative modal logics can be given canonical coalgebraic semantics.
The semantics are equivalent to neighbourhood semantics with frame conditions.
Deontic logics with factual detachment are included as examples.
Abstract
A modal logic is \emph{non-iterative} if it can be defined by axioms that do not nest modal operators, and \emph{rank-1} if additionally all propositional variables in axioms are in scope of a modal operator. It is known that every syntactically defined rank-1 modal logic can be equipped with a canonical coalgebraic semantics, ensuring soundness and strong completeness. In the present work, we extend this result to non-iterative modal logics, showing that every non-iterative modal logic can be equipped with a canonical coalgebraic semantics defined in terms of a copointed functor, again ensuring soundness and strong completeness via a canonical model construction. Like in the rank-1 case, the canonical coalgebraic semantics is equivalent to a neighbourhood semantics with suitable frame conditions, so the known strong completeness of non-iterative modal logics over neighbourhood…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems · Advanced Algebra and Logic
