Triangle Singularity as the Origin of the $a_1(1420)$
G.D. Alexeev, M.G. Alexeev, A. Amoroso, V. Andrieux, V. Anosov, A., Antoshkin, K. Augsten, W. Augustyniak, C.D.R. Azevedo, B. Badelek, F., Balestra, M. Ball, J. Barth, R. Beck, Y. Bedfer, J. Berenguer Antequera, J., Bernhard, M. Bodlak, F. Bradamante, A. Bressan, V.E. Burtsev

TL;DR
The paper demonstrates that the observed $a_1(1420)$ signal can be explained by a triangle singularity involving known mesons, challenging the interpretation of it as a new resonance.
Contribution
It introduces a dispersion relation-based approach to model triangle singularities and shows this can account for the $a_1(1420)$ signal without new resonances.
Findings
The $a_1(1420)$ signal is explained by rescattering effects, not a new resonance.
The triangle singularity model fits the data better than the resonance hypothesis.
This is the first demonstration of a light-meson structure explained by a triangle singularity.
Abstract
The COMPASS experiment recently discovered a new isovector resonance-like signal with axial-vector quantum numbers, the , decaying to . With a mass too close to and a width smaller than the axial-vector ground state , it was immediately interpreted as a new light exotic meson, similar to the , , states in the hidden-charm sector. We show that a resonance-like signal fully matching the experimental data is produced by the decay of the resonance into and subsequent rescattering through a triangle singularity into the coupled channel. The amplitude for this process is calculated using a new approach based on dispersion relations. The triangle-singularity model is fitted to the partial-wave data of the COMPASS experiment. Despite having less parameters, this fit shows a slightly better quality…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
