
TL;DR
This paper examines the limitations of the traditional Brown-York energy definition in stationary spacetimes, specifically Kerr-Newman, and proposes a corrected formulation that aligns with the original concept.
Contribution
It demonstrates the inadequacy of the naive Brown-York energy in stationary spacetimes and provides an exact corrected form for Kerr-Newman.
Findings
Naive Brown-York energy does not match the boundary stress tensor.
The corrected Brown-York energy is explicitly derived for Kerr-Newman.
The original Brown-York idea is preserved with the proper reference.
Abstract
One usually defines the Brown-York energy for a 2-surface embedded in a spacelike 3-slice as an integration of the mean curvature of the 2-surface isometrically embedded into the 3-slice, with a proper reference 3-space. We demonstrate that this naive definition is ill for stationary spacetimes. As an example, we investigate the Kerr-Newman spacetime in detail. We show that the naive definition of the Brown-York energy is not a component of the Brown-York boundary stress tensor, and thus deviates from the original idea of Brown and York. Furthermore, we present the exact form of the Brown-York energy for the Kerr-Newman spacetime with the proper reference.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
