Stability properties of a projector-splitting scheme for dynamical low rank approximation of random parabolic equations
Yoshihito Kazashi, Fabio Nobile, Eva Vidli\v{c}kov\'a

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the stability of fully discrete projector-splitting schemes for dynamical low-rank approximation of random parabolic equations, establishing conditions for explicit, semi-implicit, and implicit schemes, with numerical validation.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes a class of stable, projector-splitting numerical schemes for DLR approximation of random parabolic equations, including conditions for stability and connections to existing methods.
Findings
Explicit and semi-implicit schemes are conditionally stable under a CFL condition.
Implicit schemes are unconditionally stable.
Semi-implicit scheme can be unconditionally stable with small randomness.
Abstract
We consider the Dynamical Low Rank (DLR) approximation of random parabolic equations and propose a class of fully discrete numerical schemes. Similarly to the continuous DLR approximation, our schemes are shown to satisfy a discrete variational formulation. By exploiting this property, we establish stability of our schemes: we show that our explicit and semi-implicit versions are conditionally stable under a parabolic type CFL condition which does not depend on the smallest singular value of the DLR solution; whereas our implicit scheme is unconditionally stable. Moreover, we show that, in certain cases, the semi-implicit scheme can be unconditionally stable if the randomness in the system is sufficiently small. Furthermore, we show that these schemes can be interpreted as projector-splitting integrators and are strongly related to the scheme proposed by Lubich et al. [BIT Num. Math.,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
