The Tragedy of the AI Commons
Travis LaCroix, Aydin Mohseni

TL;DR
This paper models the social dilemma in AI ethics using stochastic game dynamics, revealing how cooperation can be fostered through small-group coordination to improve adherence to ethical guidelines.
Contribution
It introduces a formal stochastic game model to analyze AI ethics compliance and offers actionable strategies for enhancing cooperation among stakeholders.
Findings
Stochastic effects can promote cooperation in AI ethics development.
Small groups with low cooperation costs increase adherence to ethical guidelines.
Coordination in high-risk, low-cost settings is most effective for ethical compliance.
Abstract
Policy and guideline proposals for ethical artificial-intelligence research have proliferated in recent years. These are supposed to guide the socially-responsible development of AI for the common good. However, there typically exist incentives for non-cooperation (i.e., non-adherence to such policies and guidelines); and, these proposals often lack effective mechanisms to enforce their own normative claims. The situation just described constitutes a social dilemma; namely, a situation where no one has an individual incentive to cooperate, though mutual cooperation would lead to the best outcome for all involved. In this paper, we use stochastic evolutionary game dynamics to model this social dilemma in the context of the ethical development of artificial intelligence. This formalism allows us to isolate variables that may be intervened upon, thus providing actionable suggestions for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
