The astrophysical odds of GW151216
Gregory Ashton, Eric Thrane

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the likelihood that the gravitational-wave candidate GW151216 is an actual astrophysical event, using a Bayesian method that considers detector coherence and noise models, and finds it unlikely to be genuine.
Contribution
It introduces an improved Bayesian approach to assess the astrophysical nature of gravitational-wave candidates, refining the probability estimates compared to previous methods.
Findings
GW151216 has a low probability ($p_{astro}=0.03$) of being an astrophysical signal.
GW150914 and GW151012 are confirmed as highly likely astrophysical events with $p_{astro}$ of 1 and 0.997.
The new method enhances the discrimination between true signals and noise in gravitational-wave data.
Abstract
The gravitational-wave candidate GW151216 is a proposed binary black hole event from the first observing run of the Advanced LIGO detectors. Not identified as a bona fide signal by the LIGO--Virgo collaboration, there is disagreement as to its authenticity, which is quantified by , the probability that the event is astrophysical in origin. Previous estimates of from different groups range from 0.18 to 0.71, making it unclear whether this event should be included in population analyses, which typically require . Whether GW151216 is an astrophysical signal or not has implications for the population properties of stellar-mass black holes and hence the evolution of massive stars. Using the astrophysical odds, a Bayesian method which uses the signal coherence between detectors and a parameterised model of non-astrophysical detector noise,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
