The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model
T. Aoyama, N. Asmussen, M. Benayoun, J. Bijnens, T. Blum, M. Bruno, I., Caprini, C. M. Carloni Calame, M. C\`e, G. Colangelo, F. Curciarello, H., Czy\.z, I. Danilkin, M. Davier, C. T. H. Davies, M. Della Morte, S. I., Eidelman, A. X. El-Khadra, A. G\'erardin, D. Giusti

TL;DR
This paper reviews the Standard Model calculation of the muon's anomalous magnetic moment, highlighting recent improvements and the persistent discrepancy with experimental measurements, which may indicate new physics.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive update on the theoretical calculation methods for the muon g-2, especially the hadronic contributions, and discusses future prospects for reducing uncertainties.
Findings
The Standard Model prediction is $116,591,810(43) imes 10^{-11}$.
The theoretical value differs from the Brookhaven measurement by 3.7σ.
Upcoming experiments aim to reduce experimental uncertainty significantly.
Abstract
We review the present status of the Standard Model calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. This is performed in a perturbative expansion in the fine-structure constant and is broken down into pure QED, electroweak, and hadronic contributions. The pure QED contribution is by far the largest and has been evaluated up to and including with negligible numerical uncertainty. The electroweak contribution is suppressed by and only shows up at the level of the seventh significant digit. It has been evaluated up to two loops and is known to better than one percent. Hadronic contributions are the most difficult to calculate and are responsible for almost all of the theoretical uncertainty. The leading hadronic contribution appears at and is due to hadronic vacuum polarization, whereas at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
