No evidence for interstellar planetesimals trapped in the Solar System
A. Morbidelli, K. Batygin, R. Brasser, S. Raymond

TL;DR
This paper refutes previous claims of interstellar origin for certain small Solar System bodies, arguing that their observed properties are consistent with transient objects from the Solar System's distant reservoirs rather than captured interstellar objects.
Contribution
It critically analyzes prior studies, demonstrating that their methods are flawed and providing evidence that the observed bodies are likely transient Solar System objects, not interstellar captures.
Findings
Numerical simulations used previously are not indicative of past evolution.
Captured interstellar populations would need to be implausibly large.
Observed objects are consistent with transient Solar System members.
Abstract
In two recent papers published in MNRAS, Namouni and Morais (2018, 2020) claimed evidence for the interstellar origin of some small Solar System bodies, including i) objects in retrograde co-orbital motion with the giant planets, and ii) the highly-inclined Centaurs. Here, we discuss the flaws of those papers that invalidate the authors' conclusions. Numerical simulations backwards in time are not representative of the past evolution of real bodies. Instead, these simulations are only useful as a means to quantify the short dynamical lifetime of the considered bodies and the fast decay of their population. In light of this fast decay, if the observed bodies were the survivors of populations of objects captured from interstellar space in the early Solar System, these populations should have been implausibly large (e.g. about 10 times the current main asteroid belt population for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
