The ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: The nature of the faintest dusty star-forming galaxies
Manuel Aravena, Leindert Boogaard, Jorge G\'onzalez-L\'opez, Roberto, Decarli, Fabian Walter, Chris L. Carilli, Ian Smail, Axel Weiss, Roberto J., Assef, Franz Erik Bauer, Rychard J. Bouwens, Paulo C. Cortes, Pierre Cox,, Elisabete da Cunha, Emanuele Daddi, Tanio D\'iaz-Santos

TL;DR
This study characterizes faint dusty star-forming galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field using ALMA data, revealing their physical properties, redshift distribution, and relation to star formation and gas content across cosmic time.
Contribution
First detailed analysis of faint dusty galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field with ALMA, providing new insights into their properties and evolution compared to previous surveys.
Findings
Median stellar mass of $4.8 imes10^{10} M_ ext{sun}$ and SFR of 30 $M_ ext{sun}$/yr.
Median redshift of 1.8, lower than in wider surveys.
Galaxies along the main sequence dominate molecular gas density at all redshifts.
Abstract
We present a characterization of the physical properties of a sample of 35 securely-detected, dusty galaxies in the deep ALMA 1.2-mm image obtained as part of the ALMA Spectroscopic Survey in the {\it Hubble} Ultra Deep Field (ASPECS) Large Program. This sample is complemented by 26 additional sources identified via an optical/infrared source positional prior. Using their well-characterized spectral energy distributions, we derive median stellar masses and star formation rates (SFR) of and 30 yr, and interquartile ranges of and yr, respectively. We derive a median spectroscopic redshift of 1.8 with an interquartile range , significantly lower than submillimeter galaxies detected in shallower, wide-field surveys. We find that 59\%13\%, 6\%4\%, and 34\%9\% of our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
