A tetrachotomy of ontology-mediated queries with a covering axiom
Olga Gerasimova, Stanislav Kikot, Agi Kurucz, Vladimir Podolskii,, Michael Zakharyaschev

TL;DR
This paper classifies the data complexity of simple ontology-mediated queries with a covering axiom, revealing a detailed four-way complexity spectrum and providing conditions for query rewritability.
Contribution
It introduces a complete tetrachotomy for a basic class of ontology-mediated queries, linking syntactic features to their computational complexity.
Findings
Answering these queries is Pi^p_2-complete in combined complexity.
Data complexity ranges from AC0 to coNP-complete depending on the query.
The paper establishes conditions for FO- and datalog-rewritability.
Abstract
Our concern is the problem of efficiently determining the data complexity of answering queries mediated by description logic ontologies and constructing their optimal rewritings to standard database queries. Originated in ontology-based data access and datalog optimisation, this problem is known to be computationally very complex in general, with no explicit syntactic characterisations available. In this article, aiming to understand the fundamental roots of this difficulty, we strip the problem to the bare bones and focus on Boolean conjunctive queries mediated by a simple covering axiom stating that one class is covered by the union of two other classes. We show that, on the one hand, these rudimentary ontology-mediated queries, called disjunctive sirups (or d-sirups), capture many features and difficulties of the general case. For example, answering d-sirups is Pi^p_2-complete for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Advanced Database Systems and Queries · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
